Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1989122: let openshift-sdn use EndpointSliceProxying #1166

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 3, 2021

Conversation

danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

openshift/sdn#296 added support for EndpointSliceProxying to openshift-sdn, so we no longer have to forcibly disable it.

Then once we rebase sdn to kube 1.22 we can use the endpoint termination stuff

/cc @abhat @Miciah

The "Validate that we don't allow the feature-gates to be set via user
config" test was using a syntactically-invalid value of feature-gates,
so it would have failed even if we did allow feature-gates to be set.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abhat and Miciah July 28, 2021 12:18
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 28, 2021
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI is using pre-openshift/sdn#296 image still...

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
needs to wait for openshift/sdn#329 but then this is ready (and blocks rebasing sdn to 1.22)
/assign @abhat @squeed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 1, 2021
@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Aug 2, 2021

/lgtm

woohoo

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, squeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@danwinship danwinship changed the title let openshift-sdn use EndpointSliceProxying Bug 1989122: let openshift-sdn use EndpointSliceProxying Aug 2, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989122, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

Bug 1989122: let openshift-sdn use EndpointSliceProxying

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 2, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from zhaozhanqi August 2, 2021 13:40
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 2, 2021
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-ipsec

PR only modifies unit tests and sdn config generation. OVN tests are irrelevant

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

@danwinship: Overrode contexts on behalf of danwinship: ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-ipsec, ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-ipsec

PR only modifies unit tests and sdn config generation. OVN tests are irrelevant

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
(irrelevant to this PR)

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

@danwinship: Overrode contexts on behalf of danwinship: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
(irrelevant to this PR)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit f46a5e6 into openshift:master Aug 3, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2021

@danwinship: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1989122 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1989122: let openshift-sdn use EndpointSliceProxying

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@danwinship danwinship deleted the endpointslices branch August 3, 2021 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants