New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1769015: Bump library go #398
Bug 1769015: Bump library go #398
Conversation
@abhat: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769015, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I will uncomment the crdTypes in https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/24058/files#diff-b212b5fb9c78264b938f2bc554a80376R140 via a separate PR on origin. @alexanderConstantinescu, @JacobTanenbaum - the egressnetworkpolicies, hostsubnets etc. are not CRDs right? |
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade |
/test e2e-gcp |
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade |
/retest |
/test e2e-gcp |
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade |
/test e2e-gcp |
bd7255a
to
a692605
Compare
/test e2e-gcp |
So, are we using the generated CRDs from library-go or not? Did we have to customize them? |
This is the interim manual fix for 4.3; Once the annotations changes are
merged in openshift/api we can pull in the vendored CRDs for 4.4.
…On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 04:01 Casey Callendrello ***@***.***> wrote:
So, are we using the generated CRDs from library-go or not? Did we have to
customize them?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#398?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAULWLXRL7CYEEGHPJN5YTQX3BLDA5CNFSM4JNSIWTKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGK6AGA#issuecomment-563470360>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAULWJLC4Z74KL2QP7OMWDQX3BLDANCNFSM4JNSIWTA>
.
|
ack |
a692605
to
8d0315a
Compare
8d0315a
to
2deb04b
Compare
@squeed, @danwinship can one of you lgtm please? |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhat, danwinship, squeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-4.3 |
@juanluisvaladas: new pull request created: #491 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No description provided.