OCPBUGS-22095: Render: Add MCSelector to missing default MCPs

[jlojosnegros]

Newly added MCPs lack MachineConfigSelector field.

modifies: #833

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jlojosnegros: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22095, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @shajmakh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Newly added MCPs lack MachineConfigSelector field.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[MarSik]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlojosnegros, MarSik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [MarSik]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@jlojosnegros: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jlojosnegros: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22095: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator#833

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

• openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator#935 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22095 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Newly added MCPs lack MachineConfigSelector field.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-bot]

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build cluster-node-tuning-operator-container-v4.16.0-202402150209.p0.gd7c3111.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit cluster-node-tuning-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jlojosnegros: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22095: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator#833

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

• openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator#935 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22095 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Newly added MCPs lack MachineConfigSelector field.

modifies: #833

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jlojosnegros]

/cherry-pick release-4.15

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@jlojosnegros: new pull request created: #959

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.