Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1812583: Normalize CPU requests on masters #334

Merged

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

The openshift-apiserver uses approximately 10% of master CPU in a
reasonable medium sized workload. Given a 1 core per master baseline
(since CPU is compressible and shared), assign the openshift-apiserver
roughly 10% of that core on each master.

4.4 bug is 1812709

The openshift-apiserver uses approximately 10% of master CPU in a
reasonable medium sized workload. Given a 1 core per master baseline
(since CPU is compressible and shared), assign the openshift-apiserver
roughly 10% of that core on each master.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@smarterclayton: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1812583, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1812583: Normalize CPU requests on masters

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 11, 2020
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sttts poke

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Mar 23, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 23, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a17b601 into openshift:master Mar 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@smarterclayton: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1812583 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1812583: Normalize CPU requests on masters

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: new pull request created: #342

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants