Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile.rhel7 baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config #37

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile.rhel7 baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config #37

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is autogenerated by the ocp-build-data-enforcer.
It updates the base images in the Dockerfile used for promotion in order to ensure it
matches the configuration in the ocp-build-data repository used
for producing release artifacts.

Instead of merging this PR you can also create an alternate PR that includes the changes found here.

If you believe the content of this PR is incorrect, please contact the dptp team in
#aos-art.

@openshift-bot
Updating Dockerfile.rhel7 baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config
a493c18 
This PR is autogenerated by the [ocp-build-data-enforcer][1].
It updates the base images in the Dockerfile used for promotion in order to ensure it
matches the configuration in the [ocp-build-data repository][2] used
for producing release artifacts.

Instead of merging this PR you can also create an alternate PR that includes the changes found here.

If you believe the content of this PR is incorrect, please contact the dptp team in
#aos-art.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/ci-tools/tree/master/cmd/ocp-build-data-enforcer
[2]: https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/openshift-4.6/images
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1878163, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile.rhel7 baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 17, 2020
@yselkowitz
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@yselkowitz
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@crawford crawford added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Sep 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

18 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@crawford
Copy link

It doesn't look like this is going to succeed:

Waiting for deployment "clusterresourceoverride-operator-registry" rollout to finish: 0 of 1 updated replicas are available...
error: deployment "clusterresourceoverride-operator-registry" exceeded its progress deadline

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 21, 2020
This was referenced Sep 21, 2020
Merged
Merged
Merged
@crawford
Copy link

/hold cancel
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 22, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-olm a493c18 link /test e2e-aws-olm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@crawford
Copy link

/hold

From the artifacts:

sed: couldn't open temporary file /manifests/4.6/sed5N5qEV: Permission denied

cc @yaacov Do you know what this permission issue is about?

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2020
Merged
@wking wking mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2020
Merged
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 22, 2020
@crawford crawford closed this Dec 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1878163. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile.rhel7 baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@awgreene awgreene Awaiting requested review from awgreene

@tkashem tkashem Awaiting requested review from tkashem

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@openshift-bot @openshift-ci-robot @yselkowitz @crawford