New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1835112: ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade #277
Bug 1835112: ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade #277
Conversation
@gabemontero: An error was encountered updating to the POST state for bug 1835112 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835112, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So to clarify:
- We want to ensure that the samples operator bootstraps as
Removed
on 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and now 4.5 for Power and Z - In 4.6 we will alter this behavior if we have samples for non-x86 platforms (Power seems likely, Z may make it, too).
If so, please update the title and description of this PR so that it is clear what our intentions are with this fix. We should also keep this bug on the blocker list so we ensure upgrades work properly on Power and Z (backports will also be needed).
19e9652
to
720a232
Compare
/hold cancel @dbenoit17 and I have verified these changes in s390x with a 4.2 -> 4.3 upgrde @adambkaplan - commit msg / PR title updated as well your clarification on the intent was correct |
also note, until some form of openshift/origin#25018 merges image-eco will not pass @adambkaplan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, gabemontero The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/hold this also will need openshift/origin#25018 to merge for image-eco to pass |
/hold cancel /retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@gabemontero: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-samples-operator#277, openshift/cluster-samples-operator#271. Bugzilla bug 1835112 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1 similar comment
@gabemontero: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-samples-operator#277, openshift/cluster-samples-operator#271. Bugzilla bug 1835112 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherrypick release-4.4 |
@gabemontero: #277 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.4":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1 similar comment
@gabemontero: #277 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.4":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold
until @dbenoit17 and I verify these changes via a 4.3 based branch he is testing on s390 for me