Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1902601: Fix resources in cinder csi deployment template #108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

mandre
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre commented Dec 3, 2020

This should fix the "Managed cluster should ensure control plane pods do
not run in best-effort QoS" CI test that is currently failing with:

5 pods found in best-effort QoS:
openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-controller-5bfc8fdf46-k9h6f is running in best-effort QoS
openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-node-gqmzg is running in best-effort QoS
openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-node-hn5pp is running in best-effort QoS
openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-node-nsffx is running in best-effort QoS
openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator-7f968db7f-hkvmj is running in best-effort QoS

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-openstack-4.7/1334497702402068480

@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Dec 3, 2020

/cc Fedosin

Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2020
@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Dec 3, 2020

resources:
requests:
cpu: 10m
memory: 20Mi
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"make update-bindata"

@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Dec 3, 2020

"make update-bindata"

Arg, this is not the first time. I should put this command in my git hooks.

This should fix the "Managed cluster should ensure control plane pods do
not run in best-effort QoS" CI test that is currently failing with:

    5 pods found in best-effort QoS:
    openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-controller-5bfc8fdf46-k9h6f is running in best-effort QoS
    openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-node-gqmzg is running in best-effort QoS
    openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-node-hn5pp is running in best-effort QoS
    openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-node-nsffx is running in best-effort QoS
    openshift-cluster-csi-drivers/openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator-7f968db7f-hkvmj is running in best-effort QoS

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-openstack-4.7/1334497702402068480

Also bump the memory requirements to 50Mi to align with aws-ebs.
Copy link
Member

@bertinatto bertinatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, Fedosin, mandre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mandre mandre changed the title Fix resources in cinder csi deployment template Bug 1902601: Fix resources in cinder csi deployment template Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mandre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1902601, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.7.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1902601: Fix resources in cinder csi deployment template

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 4, 2020
@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Dec 4, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mandre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1902601, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ca4feca into openshift:master Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mandre: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1902601 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1902601: Fix resources in cinder csi deployment template

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants