Add Apache 2.0 License

[csrwng]

Adds LICENSE file to this repository

[LalatenduMohanty]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

@LalatenduMohanty: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[wking]

Do we want README.md and/or CONTRIBUTING.md wording to make the grant explicit? Vs. relying on the presence of a LICENSE file to implicitly grant access under the license's terms. I'm also fine punting this point to follow-up discussion.

And I explicitly release all of my previous contributions to this repository under the Apache License, Version 2.0, if any of them were significant enough to be copyrightable in the first place ;).

[LalatenduMohanty]

Do we want README.md and/or CONTRIBUTING.md wording to make the grant explicit? Vs. relying on the presence of a LICENSE file to implicitly grant access under the license's terms. I'm also fine punting this point to follow-up discussion.

This came to my mind when I was reviewing the PR as well. Cross checked couple of other repositories and I did not see the license explicitly mentioned in the readme. So I think this PR as it is , should be fine.

[openshift-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

[openshift-bot]

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

[csrwng]

/remove-lifecycle rotten

[crawford]

/lgtm
/approve
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

[openshift-ci-robot]

@crawford: Overrode contexts on behalf of crawford: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade, ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws, ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade

In response to this:

/lgtm
/approve
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: crawford, csrwng, LalatenduMohanty

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [crawford]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment