Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job #276

smarterclayton · 2019-12-09T17:13:39Z

We want to be in burstable QoS, and we want to avoid causing warnings
if e2e runs detect that we happen to be running when they see we
aren't in burstable.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-09T17:13:43Z

@smarterclayton: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1781283 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 100500: Insecure dependency in parameter 3 of DBI::db=HASH(0x55b6fad5b308)->do method call while running with -T switch at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x55b6fad28aa0)', 1) called at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 121
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x55b6fad6a0e8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x55b6fb78e508)', 'HASH(0x55b6fb6ce518)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x55b6fb6ce518)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1170
Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x55b6fa68d160)') called at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55b6fa6698f8)') called at (eval 2631) line 1
eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params)
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55b6faa21e90)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55b6faa21e90)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55b6fa71d220)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55b700f110c0)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55b700f110c0)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55b6fa71d220)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55b6fa71d220)') called at (eval 2631) line 0
eval {...} called at (eval 2631) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

We want to be in burstable QoS, and we want to avoid causing warnings if e2e runs detect that we happen to be running when they see we aren't in burstable.

sdodson · 2019-12-09T21:15:36Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-09T21:15:39Z

@sdodson: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1781283 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 100500: Insecure dependency in parameter 3 of DBI::db=HASH(0x5620fa5221a0)->do method call while running with -T switch at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x5620fae9bbe0)', 1) called at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 121
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x5620fa6dd5e0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x5620fa5cfea8)', 'HASH(0x5620fa710cb0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x5620fa710cb0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1170
Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x5620fa658c90)') called at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620fa5a4ef0)') called at (eval 2864) line 1
eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params)
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620fa5252a8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620fa5252a8)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620fa3f46f8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5620f98144f8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5620f98144f8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620fa3f46f8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620fa3f46f8)') called at (eval 2864) line 0
eval {...} called at (eval 2864) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

abhinavdahiya · 2019-12-09T21:54:51Z

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-09T21:54:55Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [abhinavdahiya,smarterclayton]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

abhinavdahiya · 2019-12-09T21:54:58Z

/retest

abhinavdahiya · 2019-12-09T21:55:10Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-09T21:55:13Z

@abhinavdahiya: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1781283 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 100500: Insecure dependency in parameter 3 of DBI::db=HASH(0x55b6fb198660)->do method call while running with -T switch at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x55b6faec19e8)', 1) called at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 121
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x55b6fa68d650)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x55b6fa7113e0)', 'HASH(0x55b6faa94b98)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x55b6faa94b98)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1170
Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x55b6fb063ab8)') called at /loader/0x55b6f4cee870/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55b6fb0d44c8)') called at (eval 2174) line 1
eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params)
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55b6fac45820)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55b6fac45820)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55b6fb09d648)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55b6fab5f2a8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55b6fab5f2a8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55b6fb09d648)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55b6fb09d648)') called at (eval 2174) line 0
eval {...} called at (eval 2174) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-09T23:21:08Z

@smarterclayton: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1781283 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

smarterclayton · 2019-12-12T05:25:11Z

/cherry-pick release-4.3

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2019-12-12T05:25:18Z

@smarterclayton: new pull request could not be created: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"No commits between openshift:release-4.3 and openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-276-to-release-4.3"}],"documentation_url":"https://developer.github.com/v3/pulls/#create-a-pull-request"}

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

smarterclayton · 2019-12-12T05:51:29Z

Oh, already backported.

…

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:25 AM OpenShift Cherrypick Robot < ***@***.***> wrote: @smarterclayton <https://github.com/smarterclayton>: new pull request could not be created: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"No commits between openshift:release-4.3 and openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-276-to-release-4.3"}],"documentation_url":" https://developer.github.com/v3/pulls/#create-a-pull-request"} In response to this <#276 (comment)> : /cherry-pick release-4.3 Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here <https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md>. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra <https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:> repository. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#276?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAI37JZYZKNRMXJ5FUKJWITQYHDMBA5CNFSM4JYNELKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGVQC5Y#issuecomment-564855159>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI37J2BGIJTXO4WWUMCT5DQYHDMBANCNFSM4JYNELKA> .

openshift-ci-robot requested review from crawford and wking December 9, 2019 17:13

openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 9, 2019

cvo: Set resource requests on the extract job

f9f5cd7

We want to be in burstable QoS, and we want to avoid causing warnings if e2e runs detect that we happen to be running when they see we aren't in burstable.

smarterclayton force-pushed the resource branch from 62bf86f to f9f5cd7 Compare December 9, 2019 17:15

openshift-ci-robot assigned abhinavdahiya Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 9, 2019

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2671e35 into openshift:master Dec 9, 2019

sdodson mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2019

Bug 1781284: Set resource requests on the extract job #278

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job #276

Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job #276

smarterclayton commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

sdodson commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Dec 9, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

smarterclayton commented Dec 12, 2019

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 12, 2019

smarterclayton commented Dec 12, 2019 via email

Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job #276

Bug 1781283: Set resource requests on the extract job #276

Conversation

smarterclayton commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

sdodson commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Dec 9, 2019

abhinavdahiya commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2019

smarterclayton commented Dec 12, 2019

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 12, 2019

smarterclayton commented Dec 12, 2019 via email