Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1976307: add ImageStreams manifest delete annotation logic #618

Merged

Conversation

jottofar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 25, 2021

@jottofar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1976307, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1976307: add ImageStreams manifest delete annotation logic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 25, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 25, 2021
@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 25, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 25, 2021

@jottofar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1976307, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianlinliu

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jianlinliu June 25, 2021 19:17
@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is needed by
openshift/cluster-samples-operator#380

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jottofar, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Member

@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add an unit test for this?

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we add an unit test for this?

There are no unit tests specific to resource type, e.g. imagestreams vs. deployments. There's only the generic delete annotation unit tests in lib/resourcedelete/helper_test.go which this mod doesn't affect.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we add an unit test for this?

Actually, thinking about this more, you're probably asking "can we add a unit test that would've caught this issue". Probably so but I don't think there's anything there now to "build on" but I'll look again to see what can be done.

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

you're probably asking "can we add a unit test that would've caught this issue"

I looked at this when I originally added the resourcedelete package. There were no Unit tests for resourcebuilder and what I wanted for a Unit test then, and needs to be tested now to have caught this issue, is a test at the resourcebuilder Do method level. But I don't see a good way to do that, i.e. one which does not involve running on a cluster.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a304b71 into openshift:master Jun 29, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 29, 2021

@jottofar: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1976307 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1976307: add ImageStreams manifest delete annotation logic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jottofar jottofar deleted the bug-1976307-is-delete-fix branch June 29, 2021 12:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants