Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2093601: allow project access page to update the settings twice #11713

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2022

Conversation

debsmita1
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093601

Root analysis:
The submit button was disabled because when the form is updated after being saved the validation schema returns namespace required error

Solution description:
Removed namespace from the validation schema

GIF:
pa

/kind bug

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 15, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2022

@debsmita1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2093601, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sanketpathak

In response to this:

Bug 2093601: allow project access page to update the settings twice

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/dev-console Related to dev-console label Jun 15, 2022
@debsmita1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @jerolimov

@debsmita1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ import * as yup from 'yup';
import i18n from '@console/internal/i18n';

export const validationSchema = yup.object().shape({
namespace: yup.string().required(i18n.t('devconsole~Required')),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need this in initial values then?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed it

@debsmita1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@jerolimov
Copy link
Member

/retest

@jerolimov
Copy link
Member

jerolimov commented Jun 20, 2022

Two more ideas were unrelated to this bug!

As discussed in slack:

  1. Instead of modifying a global const roleBinding: RoleBinding in project-access-form-utils-types.ts I would make the code cleaner to pass the namespace to sendRoleBindingRequest
  2. Replace getActiveNamespace() with just namespace (from the props = from the URL)

Copy link
Member

@jerolimov jerolimov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit :)

Comment on lines 91 to 104
const roleBinding: RoleBinding = {
apiVersion: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1',
kind: 'RoleBinding',
metadata: {
name: '',
namespace,
},
roleRef: {
apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io',
kind: 'ClusterRole',
name: '',
},
subjects: [],
};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might work (as before) because the network call serializes the body (roleBinding) in sendK8sRequest

But I would recommend to not modifying the roleBinding in every _.forEach(roles,... loops and passing the same instance (===) multiple times to another API call.

Can you move this const roleBinding: Rolebinding... into the loop? And then we might also can set the metadata.name and maybe other fields when constructing it instead of assign/modify it.

Suggested change
const roleBinding: RoleBinding = {
apiVersion: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1',
kind: 'RoleBinding',
metadata: {
name: '',
namespace,
},
roleRef: {
apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io',
kind: 'ClusterRole',
name: '',
},
subjects: [],
};
const roleBinding: RoleBinding = {
apiVersion: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1',
kind: 'RoleBinding',
metadata: {
name: roleBindingName,
namespace,
},
roleRef: {
apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io',
kind: 'ClusterRole',
name: user.role,
},
subjects,
};

Copy link
Member

@jerolimov jerolimov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, tested it and it works fine 👍

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: debsmita1, jerolimov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2022

@debsmita1: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 2a55eb5 into openshift:master Jun 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2022

@debsmita1: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2093601 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2093601: allow project access page to update the settings twice

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/dev-console Related to dev-console kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants