New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-13357: add multipath device type to LocalVolumeSet #12805
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-13357: add multipath device type to LocalVolumeSet #12805
Conversation
@RomanBednar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13357, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold until openshift/local-storage-operator#408 is merged |
@RomanBednar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13357, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@RomanBednar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13357, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@yanpzhan @XiyunZhao Could you please take a look and add the cherry-pick-approved when you get a chance? I pre-merge test looks good from storage side. Thanks! |
/unhold openshift/local-storage-operator#408 is now merged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed
@yanpzhan @XiyunZhao ^^^ |
@RomanBednar Let me ping them in slack, maybe they missed the e-mails notifications. |
@yanpzhan: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, Phaow, RomanBednar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
71e1f80
into
openshift:release-4.12
@RomanBednar: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13357: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13357 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-console-container-v4.12.0-202311301030.p0.g71e1f80.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-enterprise-console. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.12.0-0.nightly-2023-11-30-154028 |
This is a cherry-pick of #12723 and #13022