Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1763091: Query Browser: Use different example query for Dev perspective #3254

Conversation

kyoto
Copy link
Member

@kyoto kyoto commented Nov 6, 2019

The Admin perspective example query generally doesn't return any data in
the Dev perspective, so use a different example for Dev.

The Admin perspective example query generally doesn't return any data in
the Dev perspective, so use a different example for Dev.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kyoto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1763091, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1763091: Query Browser: Use different example query for Dev perspective

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. component/core Related to console core functionality component/monitoring Related to monitoring labels Nov 6, 2019
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 6, 2019
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.3 milestone Nov 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kyoto, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c4c9cb6 into openshift:master Nov 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kyoto: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1763091 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1763091: Query Browser: Use different example query for Dev perspective

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kyoto kyoto deleted the query-browser-dev-example-query branch November 7, 2019 03:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/monitoring Related to monitoring lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants