Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1786429: Add replicas info on StatefulSet Overview #4590

Conversation

cyril-ui-developer
Copy link
Contributor

@cyril-ui-developer cyril-ui-developer commented Mar 2, 2020

/assign @TheRealJon
/cc @benjaminapetersen @spadgett

There are ("Annotation key for deployment revision -'deployment.kubernetes.io/revision' " and "Annotation key for deployment config latest version- 'openshift.io/deployment-config.latest-version' ") constants used in the implementation of Deployment and DeploymentConfig pod info for donut chart.

I am wondering if there is "Annotation key..." for StatefulSet resource. Although, the donut plots without it.

Screen Shot 2020-03-05 at 9 13 06 AM

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. component/core Related to console core functionality component/shared Related to console-shared labels Mar 2, 2020
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminapetersen: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen changed the title Bug 1786429 - Add replicas info on StatefulSet Overview Bug 1786429: Add replicas info on StatefulSet Overview Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cyril-ui-developer: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1786429, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1786429: Add replicas info on StatefulSet Overview

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminapetersen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1786429, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

for 4.5

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2020
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

/milestone v4.5

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen added this to the v4.5 milestone Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cyril-ui-developer: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1786429, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1786429: Add replicas info on StatefulSet Overview

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 7, 2020
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 19, 2020
if (!targetDeployment) {
throw new Error(`Invalid target deployment resource: (${targetDeployment})`);
if (!targetResource) {
throw new Error(`Invalid target deployment resource: (${targetResource})`);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe

(`Invalid target resource: (${targetResource})`)

Or

(`Invalid target ${resourceKinds[kind]} resource: (${targetResource})`)

Or also use the model label (singluar):

// Stateful Set, Deployment, Deployment Config
(`Invalid target ${resourceModel.label} resource: (${targetResource})`)

);
};

public getStatefulSetsForResource = (ss: K8sResourceKind): PodControllerOverviewItem[] => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont think this func is quite right.

Deployment -> ReplicaSets -> Pods
StatefulSet -> ReplicaSet -> Pods

Stateful sets are not "for" another resource type.

@@ -881,4 +895,25 @@ export class TransformResourceData {
};
});
};

public getPodsForStatefuls = (ss: K8sResourceKind[]): PodRCData[] => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

getPodsForStatefulSet probably?

Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benjaminapetersen, cyril-ui-developer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 2, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 55eab9f into openshift:master Apr 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cyril-ui-developer: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#4590. Bugzilla bug 1786429 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1786429: Add replicas info on StatefulSet Overview

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/shared Related to console-shared lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants