[release-4.6] Bug 1887782: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status #6923

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-10-14T12:38:38Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6916

/assign rawagner

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-14T12:38:53Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1885138 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1888218. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.6] Bug 1888218: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-14T12:39:16Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

yaacov · 2020-10-14T12:54:49Z

/retitle [release-4.6.z] Bug 1888218: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-14T13:00:59Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console	`809a058`	link	`/test e2e-gcp-console`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

yaacov · 2020-10-15T09:35:29Z

/lgtm
/approve

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-15T09:35:47Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~frontend/packages/kubevirt-plugin/OWNERS~~ [yaacov]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

yaacov · 2020-10-15T09:36:10Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-15T09:36:14Z

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-15T09:41:55Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-16T01:00:12Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-16T01:00:15Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-17T01:01:04Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-17T01:01:08Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-20T01:00:32Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-20T01:00:36Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-21T01:01:13Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-21T01:01:17Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.6.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-22T01:00:34Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-22T01:00:45Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T01:01:18Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-23T01:01:22Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-24T01:00:58Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-24T01:01:01Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-25T01:00:43Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-25T01:00:46Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-26T01:00:41Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-26T01:00:45Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-27T01:01:09Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-27T01:01:13Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-15T01:01:29Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-15T01:01:33Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-16T01:01:30Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-16T01:01:34Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-29T01:01:06Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-29T01:01:09Z

@openshift-bot: An error was encountered searching for dependent bug 1885138 for bug 1888218 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-30T01:01:07Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-30T01:01:10Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888218, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

rawagner · 2020-11-30T06:19:37Z

/retitle [release-4.6] Bug 1887782: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-30T06:20:01Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1887782, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1885138 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1885138 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
bug has dependents

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-02T18:56:29Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/console#6923

Bugzilla bug 1887782 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Include CDI disk cloning to VM status

809a058

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2020

Bug 1885138: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status #6916

Merged

openshift-ci-robot assigned rawagner Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin label Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from mareklibra and vojtechszocs October 14, 2020 12:38

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.6] Bug 1885138: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status~~ [release-4.6] Bug 1888218: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.6] Bug 1888218: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status~~ [release-4.6.z] Bug 1888218: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot assigned yaacov Oct 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.6.z] Bug 1888218: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status~~ [release-4.6] Bug 1887782: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status Nov 30, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 30, 2020

openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 30, 2020

sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Dec 2, 2020

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3c381c0 into openshift:release-4.6 Dec 2, 2020

spadgett added this to the v4.6.z milestone Dec 9, 2020

[release-4.6] Bug 1887782: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status #6923

[release-4.6] Bug 1887782: Include CDI disk cloning to VM status #6923

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

yaacov commented Oct 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

yaacov commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2020

yaacov commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 15, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 17, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 17, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 21, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 23, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 24, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 24, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 25, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 25, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 26, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 26, 2020

openshift-bot commented Oct 27, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

openshift-bot commented Nov 15, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 15, 2020

openshift-bot commented Nov 16, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2020

openshift-bot commented Nov 29, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 29, 2020

openshift-bot commented Nov 30, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 30, 2020

rawagner commented Nov 30, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 30, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 2, 2020