Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CONSOLE-2448: i18n for configmaps #7045

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 5, 2020
Merged

CONSOLE-2448: i18n for configmaps #7045

merged 1 commit into from Nov 5, 2020

Conversation

zherman0
Copy link
Member

@zherman0 zherman0 commented Oct 29, 2020 •
edited by openshift-ci-robot

CONSOLE-2448: i18n for configmaps

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Oct 29, 2020
@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @spadgett

@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

spadgett
spadgett approved these changes Oct 30, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold
/assign @yapei @ahardin-rh @sferich888

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 30, 2020
@spadgett spadgett mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2020
Merged
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

@zherman0 FYI, needs rebase

@spadgett spadgett added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 30, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone Oct 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 30, 2020
@sferich888
Copy link

/label px-approved
/unassign @sferich888

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR label Nov 2, 2020
@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

zherman0 commented Nov 2, 2020

/retest

@yanpzhan
Copy link
Contributor

yanpzhan commented Nov 4, 2020

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Nov 4, 2020
@ahardin-rh
Copy link

/label docs-approved

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Nov 4, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 4, 2020
spadgett
spadgett approved these changes Nov 4, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 4, 2020
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Nov 4, 2020

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: spadgett, zherman0

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

16 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1c7cfa0 into openshift:master Nov 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@spadgett spadgett spadgett approved these changes

@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 Awaiting requested review from jeff-phillips-18

@kyoto kyoto Awaiting requested review from kyoto

Assignees

@spadgett spadgett

@yapei yapei

@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.7
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
9 participants
@zherman0 @spadgett @sferich888 @yanpzhan @ahardin-rh @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-bot @yapei @openshift-merge-robot