Gherkin Scripts for scenarios in ODC-4419 #7101
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
c0a3ca5
to
afa96b2
Compare
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
afa96b2
to
06b0355
Compare
sanketpathak
reviewed
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
06b0355
to
0e2ee3c
Compare
|
/lgtm |
sahil143
suggested changes
Nov 5, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
0e2ee3c
to
706df9e
Compare
sahil143
reviewed
Nov 9, 2020
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
706df9e
to
9bb5c22
Compare
sahil143
reviewed
Nov 9, 2020
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
9bb5c22
to
1bc15f1
Compare
makambalaji
reviewed
Nov 9, 2020
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-operator-backed-service.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ages/dev-console/integration-tests/features/topology/topology-in-context-add-options.feature
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
1bc15f1
to
93e34d2
Compare
gajanan-more
force-pushed
the
add-in-context
branch
from
93e34d2
to
dcd8056
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gajanan-more, makambalaji, sahil143, sanketpathak The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
approved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-4805
Problem: Gherkin Scripts for scenarios in ODC-4419
Solution: These are the gherkin scripts designed covering all the scenarios related to epic ODC-4419