Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1934664: Consider finally tasks when calculating task status #8292

Merged

Conversation

rottencandy
Copy link
Contributor

This is a manual cherry pick of #8149 / #8110 .

4.6 uses the pipeline to calculate total tasks, instead of using pipelineSpec from the pipeline run like in 4.7+.
This change also continues to use the pipeline, since switching to pipelineSpec requires too many type & file changes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rottencandy: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1926843 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1934664: Consider finally tasks when calculating task status

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/dev-console Related to dev-console labels Mar 3, 2021
@rottencandy
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rottencandy: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rottencandy
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @karthikjeeyar @andrewballantyne

@rottencandy
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 3, 2021
@andrewballantyne
Copy link
Contributor

@rottencandy Your tests need updating to handle two params:

console/frontend/packages/dev-console/src/utils/__tests__/pipeline-augment.spec.ts failed

@karthikjeeyar
Copy link
Contributor

Verified and working fine.
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 4, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, karthikjeeyar, rottencandy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@karthikjeeyar
Copy link
Contributor

karthikjeeyar commented Mar 8, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

1 similar comment
@karthikjeeyar
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@karthikjeeyar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934664, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1928023 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1928023 targets the "4.7.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0, 4.7.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gamore@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 8, 2021
@crawford crawford changed the title [release-4.6] Bug 1934664: Consider finally tasks when calculating task status Bug 1934664: Consider finally tasks when calculating task status Mar 10, 2021
@crawford crawford added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Mar 10, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0ff724f into openshift:release-4.6 Mar 10, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rottencandy: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1934664 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1934664: Consider finally tasks when calculating task status

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.6.z milestone Mar 18, 2021
@rottencandy rottencandy deleted the plfinallystatus-4.6 branch May 26, 2021 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. component/dev-console Related to dev-console lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants