[release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8925

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-05-14T07:36:30Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8901

/assign spadgett

…tyling elsewhere in console Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959550 Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>

openshift-ci · 2021-05-14T07:36:39Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1959550 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1960544. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-14T07:36:44Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

spadgett

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2021-05-14T16:09:26Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~frontend/packages/kubevirt-plugin/OWNERS~~ [spadgett]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2021-05-15T01:00:58Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-15T01:01:03Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-16T01:00:51Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-16T01:00:55Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-17T01:00:55Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-17T01:01:01Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-18T01:00:55Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-18T01:01:00Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-19T01:01:01Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-19T01:01:05Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-20T01:00:36Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-20T01:00:41Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-21T01:01:14Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-21T01:01:19Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-22T01:00:34Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-22T01:00:39Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-23T01:00:40Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-23T01:00:44Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-24T01:00:41Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-24T01:00:46Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-25T01:00:46Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-25T01:00:51Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960545 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

yaacov · 2021-05-25T05:18:05Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-05-25T05:18:10Z

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960544, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.7.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1959550 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gouyang

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-26T22:13:40Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/console#8925

Bugzilla bug 1960544 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks s…

b3e5ef4

…tyling elsewhere in console Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959550 Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>

openshift-ci bot assigned spadgett May 14, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request May 14, 2021

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8901

Merged

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~[release-4.7] Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console~~ [release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested review from glekner and mareklibra May 14, 2021 07:36

openshift-ci bot added component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 14, 2021

spadgett approved these changes May 14, 2021

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested a review from gouyang May 25, 2021 05:18

sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label May 26, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0c664b7 into openshift:release-4.7 May 26, 2021

spadgett added this to the v4.7.z milestone Jun 8, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8925

[release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8925

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

spadgett left a comment

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 17, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 18, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 18, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 19, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 20, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 20, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 21, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 21, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 22, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 23, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 23, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 24, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

yaacov commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2021

[release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8925

[release-4.7] Bug 1960544: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8925

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 17, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 18, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 18, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 19, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 20, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 20, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 21, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 21, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 22, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 23, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 23, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 24, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

yaacov commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2021