Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8901

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 14, 2021

Conversation

avivtur
Copy link
Contributor

@avivtur avivtur commented May 12, 2021

Fixes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959550

Analysis / Root cause:
root cause is explained in BZ above

Solution Description:
inserted generic CSS rules to it's specific intended class, so it affects only the correct CSS class.

Screen shots / Gifs for design review:

Before:

bz_1959550_before

After:

bz_1959550_after

Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman aturgema@redhat.com

…tyling elsewhere in console

Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959550
Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 12, 2021

@avivtur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1959550, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gouyang

In response to this:

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin label May 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 12, 2021

Hi @avivtur. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 12, 2021
@avivtur
Copy link
Contributor Author

avivtur commented May 12, 2021

@yaacov Please review

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented May 12, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 12, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: avivtur, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 12, 2021
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented May 12, 2021

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 12, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-4.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@spadgett: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.7 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@spadgett: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.6 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@avivtur
Copy link
Contributor Author

avivtur commented May 12, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@avivtur
Copy link
Contributor Author

avivtur commented May 13, 2021

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 13, 2021
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented May 13, 2021

/retest
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 13, 2021
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented May 13, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 297e350 into openshift:master May 14, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

@avivtur: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1959550 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@spadgett: new pull request created: #8925

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@spadgett: new pull request created: #8926

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants