New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-28205: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-28205 #113
[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-28205: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-28205 #113
Conversation
Handle UDP responses that overflow with TC bit with test case (coredns#6277) Signed-off-by: SriHarshaBS001 <SriHarshaBS009@gmail.com> Modified-by: Grant Spence <gspence@redhat.com>
@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Lovely jubbly As with the original change, this change only affects the behavior when we already have an error and the upstream resolver is probably misbehaving. Furthermore, the changes in this PR (the release-4.13 backport) are identical to the changes in #112 (the release-4.14 backport). |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@gcs278: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
/retest-required |
/jira refresh |
@melvinjoseph86: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/test e2e-gcp-serial |
@melvinjoseph86: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/jira refresh |
@sreber84: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: melvinjoseph86. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The e2e-gcp-serial job doesn't exist for this repository or branch, so it shouldn't even be reported, much less blocking this PR. |
@Miciah: Overrode contexts on behalf of Miciah: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-serial In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Tested this PR with cluster bot. |
@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: melvinjoseph86. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
298d919
into
openshift:release-4.13
@gcs278: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28205 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build coredns-container-v4.13.0-202402020908.p0.g298d919.assembly.stream for distgit coredns. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.13.0-0.nightly-2024-02-02-103131 |
4.13 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 (I actually cherry-picked #112 to receive the merge resolution from 4.14) which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.
This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.
Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:
plugin/pkg/proxy
directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests inplugin/forward/proxy_test.go