Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] [release-4.14] OCPBUGS-XXXXX: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-XXXXX (CI Broken) #112

Conversation

gcs278
Copy link

@gcs278 gcs278 commented Jan 25, 2024

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Handle UDP responses that overflow with TC bit with test case (coredns#6277)

Signed-off-by: SriHarshaBS001 <SriHarshaBS009@gmail.com>
Modified-by: Grant Spence <gspence@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.16." or "openshift-4.16.", but it targets "4.14.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 25, 2024
@gcs278 gcs278 changed the base branch from master to release-4.14 January 25, 2024 15:01
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 25, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Miciah
Copy link

Miciah commented Jan 25, 2024

Thanks!
/approve
/lgtm

Adding the branch to the PR title...
/retitle [release-4.14] OCPBUGS-28200: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-28200

As with the original change, this change only affects the behavior when we already have an error and the upstream resolver is probably misbehaving.
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-28200: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-28200 [release-4.14] OCPBUGS-28200: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-28200 Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 25, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 25, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 25, 2024
@sreber84
Copy link

/retest-required

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 26, 2024

event happened 21 times, something is wrong: ns/openshift-monitoring statefulset/alertmanager-main hmsg/f8ed7dbffe - pathological/true reason/RecreatingTerminatedPod StatefulSet openshift-monitoring/alertmanager-main is recreating terminated Pod alertmanager-main-1 From: 07:33:54Z To: 07:33:55Z result=reject }
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade: Not related.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2024

@gcs278: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-sdn-serial
  • /test images
  • /test unit

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-gcp-sdn-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-unit

In response to this:

event happened 21 times, something is wrong: ns/openshift-monitoring statefulset/alertmanager-main hmsg/f8ed7dbffe - pathological/true reason/RecreatingTerminatedPod StatefulSet openshift-monitoring/alertmanager-main is recreating terminated Pod alertmanager-main-1 From: 07:33:54Z To: 07:33:55Z result=reject }
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade: Not related.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 26, 2024

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 26, 2024

Different error this time:
ns/openshift-authentication route/oauth-openshift disruption/ingress-to-oauth-server connection/new should be available throughout the test
I see some related discussion about this.
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 targets the "4.15.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.15.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: melvinjoseph86.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 targets the "4.15.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.15.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 30, 2024

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8341fa7 and 2 for PR HEAD 7a0f883 in total

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 30, 2024

install failed
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrdae

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2024

@gcs278: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-sdn-serial
  • /test images
  • /test unit

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-gcp-sdn-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-coredns-release-4.14-unit

In response to this:

install failed
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrdae

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 30, 2024

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@Miciah
Copy link

Miciah commented Jan 31, 2024

/refresh

@Miciah
Copy link

Miciah commented Jan 31, 2024

/tide refresh

@Miciah Miciah closed this Jan 31, 2024
@Miciah Miciah reopened this Jan 31, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 targets the "4.15.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.15.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: melvinjoseph86.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28200, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27904 targets the "4.15.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.15.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Miciah
Copy link

Miciah commented Jan 31, 2024

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 31, 2024

/test e2e-gcp-sdn-serial

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2024

@gcs278: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/images 7a0f883 link true /test images
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 7a0f883 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn 7a0f883 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
ci/prow/unit 7a0f883 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn 7a0f883 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-serial 7a0f883 link true /test e2e-gcp-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 7a0f883 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 31, 2024

Switching to #114 as something seems wrong with CI. Now, the tide link is referencing #114.
I'll leave this open for a bit in case anyone is curious what is happening.
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 31, 2024
@gcs278 gcs278 changed the title [release-4.14] OCPBUGS-28200: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-28200 [WIP] [release-4.14] OCPBUGS-XXXXX: UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-XXXXX (CI Broken) Jan 31, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 31, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

4.14 Cherry-Pick of coredns#6277 which fixes OCPBUGS-28200 by adding logic that more gracefully handles overflow errors by setting the Truncated Bit and clearing the response. This indicates to DNS clients to retry with TCP, whereas previously they would have always gotten a SERVFAIL.

This becomes more important/exposed with CoreDNS 1.10.1 (OCP 4.13) onwards, given the changes introduced by coredns#5671. This modification only uses EDNS on the upstream DNS request when the client query used EDNS. It appears that certain DNS resolvers may not handle non-EDNS queries in a compliant manner.

Cherry-Pick Merge Conflict:

CONFLICT (modify/delete): plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397).  Version 37a9afe69 (UPSTREAM: 6277: openshift: Fix OCPBUGS-27397) of plugin/pkg/proxy/proxy_test.go left in tree.
  • plugin/pkg/proxy directory doesn't exist in release-4.14 due to refactoring, so I placed the unit tests in plugin/forward/proxy_test.go
  • Required some refactoring due to function signature changes and other refactoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 31, 2024
@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Jan 31, 2024

/unassign @Miciah

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 7d3fa77 into openshift:release-4.14 Feb 1, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@gcs278
Copy link
Author

gcs278 commented Feb 1, 2024

Note: This PR wasn't explicitly merged, but somehow is showing that it merged because a PR with identical commits merged: #114

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants