Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26758,OCPBUGS-26759: add snyk config file for SAST scan #162

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #161

/assign gabemontero

Per the documented policy from ART for the SAST scans, and following
the pattern established in the openshift/oc repo, we are introducing a
snyk config file that excludes the vendor tree, as that is currently some
minor warnings.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26114 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26758. Will retitle bug to link to clone.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26081 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26759. Will retitle bug to link to clone.

An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug OCPBUGS-26145 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com/. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. You do not have the permission to see the specified issue.: request failed. Please analyze the request body for more details. Status code: 404:

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.
/retitle [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26758,OCPBUGS-26759,OCPBUGS-26145: add snyk config file for SAST scan

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #161

/assign gabemontero

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26114,OCPBUGS-26081,OCPBUGS-26145: add snyk config file for SAST scan [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26758,OCPBUGS-26759,OCPBUGS-26145: add snyk config file for SAST scan Jan 10, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 10, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26758, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26114 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26114 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26759, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26081 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26081 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26145, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.15." or "openshift-4.15.", but it targets "4.16.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26145 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.16.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #161

/assign gabemontero

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26758,OCPBUGS-26759: add snyk config file for SAST scan

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26758,OCPBUGS-26759,OCPBUGS-26145: add snyk config file for SAST scan [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-26758,OCPBUGS-26759: add snyk config file for SAST scan Jan 10, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 10, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26758, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26114 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26114 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26759, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26081 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26081 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #161

/assign gabemontero

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2024

@gabemontero: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: []

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 10, 2024
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @coreydaley

are you allowed to set the backport risk assessed label @coreydaley ?

thanks

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @coreydaley

are you allowed to set the backport risk assessed label @coreydaley ?

thanks

and the cherry pick approved label I suppose @coreydaley ?

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security e764140 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@coreydaley
Copy link
Member

/label backport-risk-assessed
/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels Jan 11, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0b75c0a into openshift:release-4.15 Jan 11, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26758: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26758 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26759: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26759 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #161

/assign gabemontero

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@gabemontero: new pull request created: #163

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-csi-driver-shared-resource-webhook-container-v4.15.0-202401121302.p0.g0b75c0a.assembly.stream for distgit ose-csi-driver-shared-resource-webhook.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants