New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2077501: Merge Upstream etcd 3.5.3 into Openshift 4.9 #119
Bug 2077501: Merge Upstream etcd 3.5.3 into Openshift 4.9 #119
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
…of-#13145-etcd-io#13237-origin-release-3.5 [backport 3.5]: Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#13145 etcd-io#13237
Stop using tip golang version in CI
…ckend out of sync
Fix for v3.5 Ensure that cluster members stored in v2store and backend are in sync
prefixArgs uses os.Setenv in e2e tests instead envMap. This creates overwrites in some test cases and have an impact on test quality and isolation between tests. This PR uses ctlcontext envMap in each tests with high priority and merges os environment variables with low priority.
Cherry pick "Fix http2 authority header in single endpoint scenario" to release-3.5
fixes: CVE-2021-3711, CVE-2021-35942, CVE-2019-9893 Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
[release-3.5] Dockerfile: bump debian bullseye-20210927
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
storage/backend: Add a gauge to indicate if defrag is active (backport)
… by multiple peers
cherry-pick to 3.5 from etcd-io#13467 exclude the same alarm type activated by multiple peers
…ying To fix a bug in the retry logic caused when the auth token is cleared after receiving `ErrInvalidAuthToken` from the server and the subsequent call to `getToken` also fails due to some reason (eg. context deadline exceeded). This leaves the client without a token and the retry will continue to fail with `ErrUserEmpty` unless the token is refreshed.
Backport PR 13308 to release-3.5
@dusk125: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077501, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@dusk125: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077501, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@dusk125: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077501, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
@dusk125: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/payload 4.11 ci blocking |
@hasbro17: trigger 5 jobs of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.11
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/9751bde0-c58d-11ec-9840-31099bf27da2-0 trigger 7 jobs of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.11
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/9751bde0-c58d-11ec-9840-31099bf27da2-1 |
/bugzilla refresh |
@dusk125: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077501, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/label cherry-pick-approved
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, geliu2016, hasbro17 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@dusk125: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2077501 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Basis for 3.5.3 merge into openshift-4.9.
This PR was generated by: