Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART #182

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Mar 10, 2023

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-etcd.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels Mar 10, 2023
@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-4.14-ose-etcd branch from 2c0996a to 5a3084a Compare March 10, 2023 05:06
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2023

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from Elbehery and wking March 10, 2023 05:06
@Elbehery
Copy link

/assign @tjungblu
/assign @dusk125

@Elbehery
Copy link

/retest-required

@Elbehery
Copy link

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2023
@Elbehery
Copy link

/retest-required

@dusk125
Copy link

dusk125 commented Mar 10, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, Elbehery, openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-etcd.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2023

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-etcd.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 13, 2023

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-etcd.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 13, 2023

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link

/retest-required

@Elbehery
Copy link

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2023

@Elbehery: Elbehery unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight.

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link

@tjungblu @dusk125 @hasbro17 could anyone override the failing CIs please ?

@tjungblu
Copy link

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2023

@tjungblu: tjungblu unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight.

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dusk125
Copy link

dusk125 commented Mar 14, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2023

@dusk125: Overrode contexts on behalf of dusk125: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial, ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2023

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Elbehery
Copy link

@deads2k @mfojtik can you please merge this ?

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-etcd.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2023

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-etcd.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
    in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
    are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
    of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2023

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-etcd images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jupierce jupierce merged commit 384dc49 into openshift:openshift-4.14 Mar 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants