New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bootkube: Update to stable-4.4 channel #2940

Merged

openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits into openshift:master from smarterclayton:channel

Jan 22, 2020

Contributor

smarterclayton commented Jan 16, 2020

Now that we are on 4.4 we need to update the default channel.

Make the example slightly simpler on version number to better reflect what
a human might see. Noticed this while updating the channel to stable-4.3 -
apparently we'd also found and replaced this value before.

smarterclayton added 2 commits

January 16, 2020 17:43


          docs: Change references to channel and version in example

bb12fdf

Make the example slightly simpler on version number to better
reflect what a human might see. Noticed this while updating the
channel to stable-4.3 - apparently we'd also found and replaced
this value before.


          bootkube: Update to stable-4.4 channel

d7fb12c

Now that we are on 4.4 we need to update the default channel.

openshift-ci-robot added the size/S label

openshift-ci-robot requested review from jcpowermac and patrickdillon

January 16, 2020 22:48

Contributor

abhinavdahiya commented Jan 17, 2020

/approve

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 17, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [abhinavdahiya]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot added the approved label

Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jan 17, 2020

/retest

Member

sdodson commented Jan 17, 2020

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot assigned sdodson

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm label

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 17, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

17 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 17, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 17, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 18, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 18, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 18, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 18, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 19, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 20, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Member

vrutkovs commented Jan 20, 2020

This seems to be crashing CVO consistently: https://storage.googleapis.com/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_installer/2940/pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws-upgrade/4265/artifacts/e2e-aws-upgrade/pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-d8d78f9b5-trltr_cluster-version-operator.log

Member

sdodson commented Jan 20, 2020

/hold
to stop the hotlooping

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold label

Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jan 21, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment

Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jan 21, 2020

/retest

Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jan 22, 2020

/hold cancel

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold label

openshift-merge-robot merged commit dd770f0 into openshift:master

wking added a commit to wking/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request


          channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4

So that Cincinnati doesn't complain when the console bumps its
hard-coded list of channels and starts asking for stable-4.4 ([1] is
in flight to remove the need for the console to hard-code available
channels, but hasn't seen much recent progress).  And even without the
console issue, the installer has been putting new clusters in
stable-4.4 since openshift/installer@d7fb12c07a (bootkube: Update to
stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift/installer#2940).

[1]: openshift/enhancements#123

This was referenced Mar 12, 2020

channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4 openshift/cincinnati-graph-data#111

Merged

data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Bump default to stable-4.5 #3287

Merged

wking added a commit to wking/openshift-installer that referenced this pull request


          data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Bump default to stable-4.5

9cd119d

Like d7fb12c (bootkube: Update to stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift#2940),
but for 4.5 (no that release-4.4 is no longer being fast-forwarded to
track master).

sdodson pushed a commit to sdodson/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request


          channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4

61820cb

So that Cincinnati doesn't complain when the console bumps its
hard-coded list of channels and starts asking for stable-4.4 ([1] is
in flight to remove the need for the console to hard-code available
channels, but hasn't seen much recent progress).  And even without the
console issue, the installer has been putting new clusters in
stable-4.4 since openshift/installer@d7fb12c07a (bootkube: Update to
stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift/installer#2940).

[1]: openshift/enhancements#123

sdodson pushed a commit to sdodson/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request


          channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4

13cec7e

So that Cincinnati doesn't complain when the console bumps its
hard-coded list of channels and starts asking for stable-4.4 ([1] is
in flight to remove the need for the console to hard-code available
channels, but hasn't seen much recent progress).  And even without the
console issue, the installer has been putting new clusters in
stable-4.4 since openshift/installer@d7fb12c07a (bootkube: Update to
stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift/installer#2940).

[1]: openshift/enhancements#123

sdodson pushed a commit to sdodson/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request


          channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4

ebba8f3

So that Cincinnati doesn't complain when the console bumps its
hard-coded list of channels and starts asking for stable-4.4 ([1] is
in flight to remove the need for the console to hard-code available
channels, but hasn't seen much recent progress).  And even without the
console issue, the installer has been putting new clusters in
stable-4.4 since openshift/installer@d7fb12c07a (bootkube: Update to
stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift/installer#2940).

[1]: openshift/enhancements#123

sdodson pushed a commit to sdodson/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request


          channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4

8653b1c

So that Cincinnati doesn't complain when the console bumps its
hard-coded list of channels and starts asking for stable-4.4 ([1] is
in flight to remove the need for the console to hard-code available
channels, but hasn't seen much recent progress).  And even without the
console issue, the installer has been putting new clusters in
stable-4.4 since openshift/installer@d7fb12c07a (bootkube: Update to
stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift/installer#2940).

[1]: openshift/enhancements#123

sdodson pushed a commit to sdodson/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request


          channels: Add candidate-4.4, fast-4.4, and stable-4.4

4218d04

So that Cincinnati doesn't complain when the console bumps its
hard-coded list of channels and starts asking for stable-4.4 ([1] is
in flight to remove the need for the console to hard-code available
channels, but hasn't seen much recent progress).  And even without the
console issue, the installer has been putting new clusters in
stable-4.4 since openshift/installer@d7fb12c07a (bootkube: Update to
stable-4.4 channel, 2020-01-16, openshift/installer#2940).

[1]: openshift/enhancements#123

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment