Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1847705: rhcos: Bump to 46.82.202006162207-0 #3763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2020

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

There's a whole lot going on in 4.6, among the changes are the
Live ISO, RHEL 8.2 (so far), new static networking handling etc.

Among all that, also we are currently pivoting from 4.5 w/RHEL 8.1
which causes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847705

@cgwalters cgwalters changed the title rhcos: Bump to 46.82.202006162207-0 Bug 1847705: rhcos: Bump to 46.82.202006162207-0 Jun 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847705, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1847705: rhcos: Bump to 46.82.202006162207-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1847705, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hardys
Copy link
Contributor

hardys commented Jun 17, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Infra flakes at least for e2e-aws
/retest

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-metal
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-vsphere

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

cgwalters commented Jun 18, 2020

Hooray, e2e-metal passed! Then we can rework for the new live ISO after this lands, then we can drop the legacy installer hopefully!

From e2e-azure:

NodeClockNotSynchronising

Hmm. Ohh...I see, we managed to break that again. Argh. Will fix.
Edit: the fix

There's a whole lot going on in 4.6, among the changes are the
Live ISO, RHEL 8.2 (so far), new static networking handling etc.

Among all that, also we are currently pivoting from 4.5 w/RHEL 8.1
which causes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847705
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Now with Azure fix so
/test e2e-azure

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm something strange is going on here...oh, I think I see, the last Azure job used an older commit, because I guess I requested the test too quickly after updating the PR. Sooo confusing, argh.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-vsphere
/test e2e-metal-ipi

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

ci/prow/e2e-azure — Job succeeded.

OK, ✔️

@ashcrow ashcrow self-requested a review June 19, 2020 18:27
@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

cc @sdodson @abhinavdahiya

@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

e2e-openstack looks to have a low success rate at the moment

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-openstack

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 19, 2020

@patrickdillon can you take a look at the vsphere failures
@pierreprinetti Can you look at the openstack failures

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-vsphere
/test e2e-openstack

@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-openstack

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 19, 2020

/lgtm
/approve
/hold
vSphere seems to never pass on this branch, lets not worry about that. Ideally openstack would at least make it past installation. Lets just review the current openstack job before clearing the hold.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ashcrow, sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 19, 2020
@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-openstack

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp

@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

The openstack job seems to be failing in general. Removing hold.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-openstack

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ashcrow: ashcrow unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file.

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-openstack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-aws

@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Jun 19, 2020

/test e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 19, 2020

@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere 7eb89ab link /test e2e-vsphere
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 7eb89ab link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 7eb89ab link /test e2e-openstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cb9c518 into openshift:master Jun 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cgwalters: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: . The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

In response to this:

Bug 1847705: rhcos: Bump to 46.82.202006162207-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants