Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1909978: update documentation for ignore-volume-az usage #4603

Merged

Conversation

Fedosin
Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin commented Jan 29, 2021

Now if we just set "ignore-volume-az = yes" in the config, users can't create PVs with the standard storage class. To workaround this issue users have to create another storage class with the availability parameter.

This commit documents how to do it.

/label platform/openstack

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added platform/openstack bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 29, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1909978, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1909978: update documentation for ignore-volume-az usage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Now if we just set "ignore-volume-az = yes" in the config, users
can't create PVs with the standard storage class. To workaround
this issue users have to create another storage class with the
`availability` parameter.

This commit documents how to do it.
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 1, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mandre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 1, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit df32ad2 into openshift:master Feb 1, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1909978 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1909978: update documentation for ignore-volume-az usage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. platform/openstack
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants