Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verifying yq is installed properly in libvirt installer containers #6319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2022

Conversation

deepsm007
Copy link
Contributor

@deepsm007 deepsm007 commented Sep 8, 2022

@deepsm007 deepsm007 changed the title Download yq in libvirt installer containers Verifying yq is installed properly libvirt installer containers Sep 8, 2022
@deepsm007 deepsm007 changed the title Verifying yq is installed properly libvirt installer containers Verifying yq is installed properly in libvirt installer containers Sep 8, 2022
@deepsm007
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @patrickdillon

Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks in line to how it's done in UPI: #6008. I'll wait on the e2e-libvirt job before giving a lgtm.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Sep 8, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 8, 2022
@r4f4 r4f4 removed their assignment Sep 8, 2022
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Sep 9, 2022

Is #6008 doing the same thing?

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Sep 9, 2022

Is #6008 doing the same thing?

@sadasu the change is similar but different semantics. #6008 was adding yq binary to the upi Dockerfile (instead of downloading it every time in the CI jobs), whereas this PR is adding the checksum verification of the downloaded yq to the libvirt Dockerfile.

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Sep 9, 2022

/test e2e-libvirt

2 similar comments
@deepsm007
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-libvirt

@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-libvirt

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Sep 15, 2022

e2e-libvirt has been permafailing when fetching the test results with error: failed to create/update secret: failed to update secret: Secret "e2e-libvirt" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes. But the building of the libvirt-installer has been successful, which is what this PR is touching.

@deepsm007
Copy link
Contributor Author

@patrickdillon can we get this merged?

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 23, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD cde9393 and 2 for PR HEAD db7deb6 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9885f6b and 1 for PR HEAD db7deb6 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e85c561 and 0 for PR HEAD db7deb6 in total

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Sep 23, 2022

/override ci/prow/e2e-libvirt

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

@sadasu: Overrode contexts on behalf of sadasu: ci/prow/e2e-libvirt

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-libvirt

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

@deepsm007: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 99b1614 into openshift:master Sep 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants