Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WiP: Debug memory leak in kubelet volume_manager populator processedPods #1520

Conversation

mpatlasov
Copy link

Jan's patch: jsafrane@40ffc8e

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Mar 20, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mpatlasov: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@mpatlasov
Copy link
Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2023

@mpatlasov: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

WiP: Debug memory leak in kubelet volume_manager populator processedPods

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mpatlasov
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mrunalp for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mpatlasov mpatlasov closed this Mar 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2023

@mpatlasov: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-commits 89a2d17 link true /test verify-commits

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants