New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to Kubernetes 1.27.3 #1609
Update to Kubernetes 1.27.3 #1609
Conversation
If the etcd member is not found, then it has already been removed, and kubeadm reset should immediately complete the 'remove-etcd-member' phase. Previously, the phase would complete only once the exponential-backoff retry expired, up to 3 minutes duration. This commit also fixes a semantic error in etcd.GetMemberID. Previously, the function returned 0 if no member was found, but 0 is not a valid member ID.
…consistent with kubelet
…ck-of-#118104-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118104: Fix waiting for CRD sync at server start
…ck-of-#118069-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118069: kubeadm: fix a bug where the static pod changes detection
…-pick-of-#118156-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118156: update webhook test to go 1.21
Applying it to the entire spec included cleaning up, which makes predicting the acceptable duration harder because it includes code not owned by the test itself. It's better to specify a timeout only for the test code itself.
the e2e framwork use active loops to wait for certain async operations, these loops need to retry on some operations and fail in others. For the functions that depend on some operations to happen, the apiserver may return 503 errors until that specific service is available, so we should retry on those too. Change-Id: Ib3d194184f6385b9d3d151c7055f27c97c21c3ff
Signed-off-by: guangli.bao <guangli.bao@daocloud.io>
…-of-#118200-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118200: e2e: apply timeout for CSI Storage Capacity test only to node
…k-of-#117586-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#117586: Add DisruptionTarget condition when preempting for critical
Signed-off-by: Rita Zhang <rita.z.zhang@gmail.com>
…-of-#118256-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118256: e2e framework retry on Service unavailable errors
…y-pick-of-#117792-kubernetes#117724-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#117792: kubeadm: Use internal etcd client through an interface kubernetes#117724: kubeadm: Make etcd member removal idempotent
Since kube-proxy in LocalModeNodeCIDR needs to obtain the PodCIDR assigned to the node it watches for the Node object. However, kube-proxy startup process requires to have these watches in different places, that opens the possibility of having a race condition if the same node is recreated and a different PodCIDR is assigned. Initializing the second watch with the value obtained in the first one allows us to detect this situation. Change-Id: I6adeedb6914ad2afd3e0694dcab619c2a66135f8 Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@google.com>
…k-of-#118356-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118356: Add ephemeralcontainer to imagepolicy securityaccount
…-of-#118499-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118499: kube-proxy avoid race condition using LocalModeNodeCIDR
Bump go version in release-1.27 Signed-off-by: Adolfo García Veytia (Puerco) <puerco@chainguard.dev>
Ran hack/update-vendor.sh Signed-off-by: Adolfo García Veytia (Puerco) <adolfo.garcia@uservers.net>
…ck-of-#117169-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#117169: supported version of etcd 3.5.7-0 for Kubernetes v1.27.0-rc.0
[release-1.27] releng/go: Update images, deps and ver to Go 1.20.5
Kubernetes official release v1.27.3
/test e2e-aws-csi |
/close |
I'm sorry, I closed the wrong PR. |
/test integration |
/override ci/prow/verify-commits /remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits |
@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/verify-commits In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial |
/hold |
With openshift/ovn-kubernetes#1717 in let's try |
@bertinatto: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/hold cancel |
Followed steps from https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/blob/master/REBASE.openshift.md#updating-with-git-merge.
/assign @soltysh