Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-15246: Bump to k8s 1.26.6 #1610

Merged
merged 30 commits into from Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

soltysh
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh commented Jun 19, 2023

No description provided.

MadhavJivrajani and others added 27 commits May 4, 2023 01:32
Bumping version to include changes that
better handle TLS errors. Bump nescessary
to prepare for when the version of Go is
bumped to 1.20

Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
Modify unwrap error utility to make it work with go1.20
This version of Go introduces a new layer of wrapping via
a new error type. The commit accounts for that while being
compatible with go1.19

Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
If the etcd member is not found, then it has already been removed, and
kubeadm reset should immediately complete the 'remove-etcd-member'
phase. Previously, the phase would complete only once the
exponential-backoff retry expired, up to 3 minutes duration.

This commit also fixes a semantic error in etcd.GetMemberID. Previously,
the function returned 0 if no member was found, but 0 is not a valid
member ID.
…ck-of-#118104-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118104: Fix waiting for CRD sync at server start
…ck-of-#118069-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118069: kubeadm: fix a bug where the static pod changes detection
[1.26] Cherry Pick of kubernetes#114766: [Prepare for go1.20] *: Bump versions and fix tests
…-pick-of-#118156-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118156: update webhook test to go 1.21
Manually modified the commit to expect Failed phase instead of Succeeded.
This is expected in 1.26 as the code in preemption.go sets it to Failed.
In 1.27 the phase is determined by `getPhase` kubelet_pods.go based
on the completed containers.
…k-of-#117586-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#117586: Add DisruptionTarget condition when preempting for critical
Signed-off-by: Rita Zhang <rita.z.zhang@gmail.com>
…y-pick-of-#117792-kubernetes#117724-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#117792: kubeadm: Use internal etcd client through an interface
kubernetes#117724: kubeadm: Make etcd member removal idempotent
Since kube-proxy in LocalModeNodeCIDR needs to obtain the PodCIDR
assigned to the node it watches for the Node object.

However, kube-proxy startup process requires to have these watches in
different places, that opens the possibility of having a race condition
if the same node is recreated and a different PodCIDR is assigned.

Initializing the second watch with the value obtained in the first one
allows us to detect this situation.

Change-Id: I6adeedb6914ad2afd3e0694dcab619c2a66135f8
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@google.com>
…k-of-#118356-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118356: Add ephemeralcontainer to imagepolicy securityaccount
…-of-#118515-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#118515: kube-proxy avoid race condition using LocalModeNodeCIDR
…Go 1.19.10

Bump release-1.26 to go 1.19.10

Signed-off-by: Adolfo García Veytia (Puerco) <adolfo.garcia@uservers.net>
Run of ./hack/update-vendor.sh

Signed-off-by: Adolfo García Veytia (Puerco) <adolfo.garcia@uservers.net>
[release-1.26] releng/go: Update images, deps and version to go 1.19.10
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Jun 19, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from mfojtik June 19, 2023 15:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Jun 22, 2023

/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits
/label backports/validated-commits

Since #1609 merge this is good to go
/remove-label jira/invalid-bug
/remove-label jira/valid-bug

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. and removed backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. labels Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@soltysh: Those labels are not set on the issue: jira/valid-bug

In response to this:

/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits
/label backports/validated-commits

Since #1609 merge this is good to go
/remove-label jira/invalid-bug
/remove-label jira/valid-bug

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gangwgr
Copy link

gangwgr commented Jun 22, 2023

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 22, 2023
@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Jun 22, 2023

/override ci/prow/verify-commits
this never passes on k8s bumps PRs

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/verify-commits

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify-commits
this never passes on k8s bumps PRs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@bertinatto bertinatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, soltysh, stlaz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Jun 22, 2023

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

@soltysh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-commits 8f41907 link true /test verify-commits

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@soltysh
Copy link
Member Author

soltysh commented Jun 22, 2023

/label jira/valid-bug

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a7ee68b into openshift:release-4.13 Jun 22, 2023
22 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15246: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15246 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh soltysh deleted the bump-1.26.6 branch June 23, 2023 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet