Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 89885: Bug 1850149: Include / prefix in the instance ID output #343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 10, 2020

Conversation

Fedosin
Copy link

@Fedosin Fedosin commented Sep 10, 2020

When we want to read an instance ID from the metadata service, cloud provider doesn't include "/" prefix, which is required for successful parsing of the provider ID later.
This commit adds the missing "/" prefix to the output.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Fedosin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1850149, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

UPSTREAM: 89885: Bug 1850149: Include / prefix in the instance ID output

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 10, 2020
… instance ID output

When we want to read an instance ID from the metadata service, cloud provider
doesn't include "/" prefix, which is required for successful parsing of
provider the ID later.
This commit adds the missing "/" prefix to the output.
@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Sep 10, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Fedosin, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 10, 2020
@Fedosin
Copy link
Author

Fedosin commented Sep 10, 2020

/test unit

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 03ae92b into openshift:master Sep 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Fedosin: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state.

Bugzilla bug 1850149 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

UPSTREAM: 89885: Bug 1850149: Include / prefix in the instance ID output

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Fedosin
Copy link
Author

Fedosin commented Nov 2, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.5

@Fedosin Fedosin deleted the bz1850149 branch November 2, 2020 14:06
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@Fedosin: cannot checkout release-4.5: error checking out release-4.5: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'release-4.5' did not match any file(s) known to git

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2020
When we want to read an instance ID from the metadata service, cloud provider
doesn't include "/" prefix, which is required for successful parsing of
provider the ID later.
This commit adds the missing "/" prefix to the output.

Cherry-picked from #343

Origin-commit: 65347c66667fe6f29819b65693221d3de56e9caa
openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes-legacy-cloud-providers that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2020
When we want to read an instance ID from the metadata service, cloud provider
doesn't include "/" prefix, which is required for successful parsing of
provider the ID later.
This commit adds the missing "/" prefix to the output.

Cherry-picked from openshift/kubernetes#343

Origin-commit: 65347c66667fe6f29819b65693221d3de56e9caa

Kubernetes-commit: eb7342883d232a9876390a0eab4344894a05b81c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants