Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.6] Bug 1885620: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas #397

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[release-4.6] Bug 1885620: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas #397

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #355

/assign vareti

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2020
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1848358 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1885620. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.6] Bug 1885620: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1848358: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.6] Bug 1848358: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas [release-4.6] Bug 1885620: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas Oct 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1885620, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1848358 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1848358 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1885620: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Oct 6, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 6, 2020
@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Oct 6, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

14 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Dec 11, 2020

/retest all

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@eparis: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • /test e2e-agnostic-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-serial
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test images
  • /test integration
  • /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp
  • /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
  • /test unit
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-commits

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-agnostic-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-aws-jenkins
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-aws-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-azure
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-integration
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-k8s-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-kubernetes-release-4.6-verify-commits

In response to this:

/retest all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Dec 11, 2020

/test all

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Dec 12, 2020

/hold
This PR had 400+ e2e failures, 1 pass, and now about 15 more failures. @sttts can you look to see what up? this is way worse than a normal flake...

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 12, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 0bd2e69 link /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws 0bd2e69 link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Jan 12, 2021

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sttts: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1885620. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1885620: Show error in status if preserve unknown fields is true for nonstructural schemas

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@sttts sttts Awaiting requested review from sttts

Assignees

@sttts sttts

@vareti vareti

@wangke19 wangke19

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @sttts @openshift-bot @vareti @wangke19 @soltysh @eparis @openshift-merge-robot