Bug 2000451: UPSTREAM: <drop>: Disable broken sig-storage test #925
Conversation
This test is failing on CI every time, fix with PR upstream has been opened, until then we are disabling it.
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
backports/unvalidated-commits
openshift-ci
bot
added
bugzilla/severity-medium
|
@lilic: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989180, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@lilic: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
|
lilic
changed the title
|
@lilic: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2000451, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@lilic: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2000451, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
bugzilla/valid-bug
Run ./hack/update-test-annotations.sh
|
@lilic: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
|
|
/lgtm |
|
@lilic: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2000451, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@jsafrane "does not meet backport criteria." means in upstream? Can't we pick it here? |
sttts
removed
the
backports/unvalidated-commits
|
/approve |
|
/retest |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane, lilic, sttts The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips |
|
@mfojtik: /override requires a failed status context or a job name to operate on.
Only the following contexts were expected:
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips |
|
@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-gcp In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
8 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp |
|
@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-gcp In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@lilic: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2000451 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@lilic: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
And to update test annotations, namely openshift/kubernetes#925.
And to update test annotations, namely openshift/kubernetes#925.
This test is failing on CI every time, fix with PR upstream (kubernetes#104077)
has been opened, until then we are disabling it.
@hexfusion this is making the CEO 4.9
e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicasfail every time. Disabling this should make sure we don't introduce any new bugs for that e2e env.@jsafrane please take a look, thanks!