Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.9] Bug 2010225: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps #986

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2021
Merged

[release-4.9] Bug 2010225: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps #986

merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2021

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #980

/assign stbenjam

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Sep 29, 2021
@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 29, 2021
Merged
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug 2000754 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. code 53: Bugzilla_api_key is not a valid parameter for the Bugzilla::Bug::create function.

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2000754: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

mandre
mandre reviewed Oct 4, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

This iperf2 test is no longer an issue on 4.10, but still a major cause of flake for 4.9:

https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=should+run+iperf2&maxAge=48h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 4, 2021
@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Oct 4, 2021

/retitle [release-4.9] Bug 2010225: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.9] Bug 2000754: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps [release-4.9] Bug 2010225: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps Oct 4, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 4, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2010225, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2000754 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2010225: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Oct 4, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2021

@mandre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2010225, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2000754 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Oct 4, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2021

@mandre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2010225, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2000754 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2000754 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 4, 2021
@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Oct 5, 2021

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 5, 2021 •
edited

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-csi-manila 15a90d8 link false /test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-csi-cinder 15a90d8 link false /test e2e-openstack-csi-cinder

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Oct 5, 2021

The e2e-openstack-csi-manila and e2e-openstack-csi-cinder failures are known issues and unrelated to this PR.

@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Oct 13, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@sttts sttts added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 13, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mandre, openshift-cherrypick-robot, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 13, 2021
@dcbw dcbw mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2021
Merged
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

18 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson sdodson added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Oct 14, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ef241fd into openshift:release-4.9 Oct 14, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2010225 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2010225: UPSTREAM: 104865: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

mandre added a commit to shiftstack/origin that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2021
@mandre
vendor: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps
ad369d1 
This change imports openshift/kubernetes#986
into Origin.

This commit is the result of running:
./hack/update-kube-vendor.sh ef241fded394346e93100d5c1be9bc41e6ed6fcf
mandre added a commit to shiftstack/origin that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2021
@mandre
vendor: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps
b92c9f4 
This change imports openshift/kubernetes#986
into Origin.

This commit is the result of running:
./hack/update-kube-vendor.sh ef241fded394346e93100d5c1be9bc41e6ed6fcf
@mandre mandre mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2021
Merged
mandre added a commit to shiftstack/origin that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2021
@mandre
vendor: e2e iperf2 change threshold to 10MBps = 80 Mbps
72e1ded 
This change imports openshift/kubernetes#986
into Origin.

This commit is the result of running:
./hack/update-kube-vendor.sh ef241fded394346e93100d5c1be9bc41e6ed6fcf
./hack/update-generated.sh
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mandre mandre mandre left review comments

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

Assignees

@mandre mandre

@stbenjam stbenjam

@sttts sttts

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
8 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @mandre @sttts @openshift-bot @sdodson @stbenjam @openshift-merge-robot