Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.9] Bug 2009857: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests #777

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #742

/assign dcbw

When logging the result of CNI requests, filter out KubeAPIAuth from the response, since it might contain sensitive information and is very verbose.

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ravaioli <rravaiol@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 96c3bf8)
…ged CNI requests

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ravaioli <rravaiol@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 545e08f)
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1999261 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 2009857. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.9] Bug 2009857: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 1999261: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.9] Bug 1999261: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests [release-4.9] Bug 2009857: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests Oct 1, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009857, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1999261 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1999261 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2009857: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Oct 1, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 1, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Oct 13, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn
openshift/kubernetes#986

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2021

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn
openshift/kubernetes#986

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Oct 13, 2021

/retest

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 21, 2021

/backport-risk-assessed

1 similar comment
@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 21, 2021

/backport-risk-assessed

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 21, 2021

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

@trozet: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers]

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 26, 2021

/backport-risk-assessed

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 26, 2021

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 26, 2021
@mrunalp mrunalp added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 26, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0eced2a into openshift:release-4.9 Oct 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 27, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2009857 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2009857: filter out KubeAPIAuth when logging CNI requests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@ricky-rav: new pull request created: #897

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants