Bug 1929721: Add SecurityProfile.EncryptionAtHost parameter to enable host-based VM encryption #818
Conversation
…rameter to enable host-based VM encryption
|
@mjudeikis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929721, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
bugzilla/severity-high
mjudeikis
changed the title
|
/bugzilla refresh |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
@mjudeikis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1929721, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
removed
the
bugzilla/invalid-bug
|
Vendor update targets release-4.7 branch, LGTM |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
lgtm
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
7 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@JoelSpeed Is the CI so flaky here or something I should be looking into? What is the state of this repo from the point of CI? |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
11 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@derekwaynecarr @JoelSpeed It is green! 🤕 |
|
@mjudeikis vSphere based CI was only recently enabled and has been causing issues for us due to the capacity of the cluster and the number of machines we use during our tests. We have some work planned to look into this. Not sure why it was marked required when we know it's flaking this much though, I think we should change that until we know it's more reliable |
crawford
changed the title
crawford
added
the
cherry-pick-approved
crawford
changed the title
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@mjudeikis: An error was encountered searching for external tracker bugs for bug 1929721 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
could not parse external identifier "openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/801/files" as pull: invalid pull identifier with 5 parts: "openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/801/files"
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
UPSTREAM: : openshift: add SecurityProfile.EncryptionAtHost parameter to enable host-based VM encryption