Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2040620: Rename MAPO image #978

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2022

Conversation

mandre
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre commented Jan 17, 2022

The image needed to change name to adhere to conventions.

Depends on openshift/release#25351

The image needed to change name to adhere to conventions.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 17, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 17, 2022

@mandre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2040620, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

Bug 2040620: Rename MAPO image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@lobziik
Copy link
Contributor

lobziik commented Jan 18, 2022

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 18, 2022
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

/assign @JoelSpeed
as the bot suggests

It was previously missing from the image-references. Add it there.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 18, 2022
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 18, 2022
@lobziik
Copy link
Contributor

lobziik commented Jan 18, 2022

/lgtm

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

I don't think the naming in the image reference matches the build data, this will need to be double checked

https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/blob/openshift-4.10/images/ose-machine-api-provider-openstack.yml

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 18, 2022
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ spec:
from:
kind: DockerImage
name: registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/openshift:openstack-machine-controllers
- name: openstack-machine-api-provider
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be good now thanks to openshift-eng/ocp-build-data#1275.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image is not yet available in the 4.10-art-latest image stream though, I'll let you know when we can merge this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's good to go, the image is there now:

$ oc describe imagestream 4.10-art-latest | grep openstack-machine-api-provider
openstack-machine-api-provider

- name: openstack-machine-api-provider
from:
kind: DockerImage
name: quay.io/openshift/origin-openstack-machine-api-provider
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm still not clear how this ref gets replaced by the one from the release payload, if that's what is really happening.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 19, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mandre
Copy link
Member Author

mandre commented Jan 19, 2022

/skip

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2022

@mandre: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-operator a3767cf link false /test e2e-azure-operator
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator a3767cf link false /test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade a3767cf link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive a3767cf link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack a3767cf link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

The test failures are unrelated to this PR. This PR does not affect AWS (apart from image build) and as such, given the cluster bootstrapped for the various tasks this clearly hasn't broken anything. Especially as the new image reference is only used with tech preview clusters, this test doesn't make sense here

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2022

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

The test failures are unrelated to this PR. This PR does not affect AWS (apart from image build) and as such, given the cluster bootstrapped for the various tasks this clearly hasn't broken anything. Especially as the new image reference is only used with tech preview clusters, this test doesn't make sense here

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b88b83b into openshift:master Jan 19, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2022

@mandre: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2040620 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2040620: Rename MAPO image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti deleted the mapo-image branch January 19, 2022 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants