-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 402
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.8] Bug 2109329: Avoid kubernetes node port range #3316
[release-4.8] Bug 2109329: Avoid kubernetes node port range #3316
Conversation
Per [0], the range 30000-32767 is used for kubernetes node ports. We should not have haproxy listening in that range to avoid possible conflicts. 9444 is adjacent to 9445 where the haproxy frontend listens, but is currently unused in the host port registry. 0: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/main/modules/installation-network-user-infra.adoc
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Detected clone of Bugzilla bug 2101794 with correct target release. Retitling PR to link to clone: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109329, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest-required |
/retest-required |
/bugzilla refresh |
@cybertron: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109329, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
/retest-required |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron, openshift-cherrypick-robot, sinnykumari The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required The openstack failure is a known issue (which has a fix in flight) and highly unlikely to be related to this patch. @reihl We also still need approval from you on this. |
/test e2e-openstack |
1 similar comment
/test e2e-openstack |
/test e2e-openstack |
/retest-required |
/retest-required I don't see how this could possible be breaking agnostic upgrade when the files changed are not even used on the platform for that job. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
@reihl This is now passing ci so it should be ready for cherry-pick-approved. Thanks! |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2109329 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #3255
/assign cybertron