Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkg/daemon: run login monitor for Degraded nodes #375

Merged

Conversation

runcom
Copy link
Member

@runcom runcom commented Feb 3, 2019

If there would ever be a way to reconcile a Degraded node, I believe it
would be worth to still learn if someone jumped on a node and messed up
with it so we can decide what to do.

Feel free to close this telling I'm dumb as well, I'm probably missing some context which led to this PR while playing around reading the code but it makes sense to me to still have something like this. This is also not fixing anything related to super early startup where someone can jump on a node before the daemon is running and tracking accesses.

This PR builds on #373, I'll rebase it once that merges

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 3, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

/approve
/assign yuqi-zhang

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2019
@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Feb 4, 2019

/hold

until pre-req is merged

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 4, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
Yes, this should be the correct behaviour, thanks for the fix!

If there would ever be a way to reconcile a Degraded node, I believe it
would be worth to still learn if someone jumped on a node and messed up
with it so we can decide what to do.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <runcom@linux.com>
@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Feb 4, 2019

rebased and push forced

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Feb 4, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 4, 2019
@ashcrow
Copy link
Member

ashcrow commented Feb 4, 2019

pre-req merged, code looks fine to me. Deferring to a second review for merge.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
Tested to work on a degraded node.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ashcrow, cgwalters, runcom, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4070aab into openshift:master Feb 4, 2019
@runcom runcom deleted the run-login-monitor-early branch February 4, 2019 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants