Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

* Remove ELB type, this will cause the system to default to Classic. #1705

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

jnpacker
Copy link
Contributor

@jnpacker jnpacker commented Jun 9, 2023

  • OCP-HyperShift will start to provide the type value
  • Make it so the Policy will only apply if the IngressController default resource is present
  • If the policy is removed, we DO NOT remove the resource Testing
  • Validated the policy on ACM 2.7.4 and ACM 2.8.0

What type of PR is this?

(bug/feature/cleanup/documentation)
bug

What this PR does / why we need it?

  • It allows for the HostedCluster to eventually control the ELB type.
  • For now the ELB will default to Classic

Which Jira/Github issue(s) this PR fixes?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-5858
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

NA

Pre-checks (if applicable):

  • Tested latest changes against a cluster. (ACM 2.7.4 & ACM 2.8)
  • Included documentation changes with PR
  • If this is a new object that is not intended for the FedRAMP environment (if unsure, please reach out to team FedRAMP), please exclude it with:

* OCP-HyperShift will start to provide the type value
* Make it so the Policy will only apply if the IngressController default resource is present
* If the policy is removed, we DO NOT remove the resource
Testing
* Validated the policy on ACM 2.7.4 and ACM 2.8.0

Signed-off-by: Joshua Packer <jpacker@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bmeng and sam-nguyen7 June 9, 2023 14:44
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 9, 2023

@jnpacker: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jnpacker
Copy link
Contributor Author

jnpacker commented Jun 9, 2023

@cdoan1 looking for a 👍🏼

@cdoan1
Copy link
Contributor

cdoan1 commented Jun 12, 2023

👍
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2023
@cblecker
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 12, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cblecker, cdoan1, jnpacker

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 12, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5da16a7 into openshift:master Jun 12, 2023
3 checks passed
@jnpacker jnpacker deleted the acm-5858 branch June 12, 2023 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants