-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AUTH-296: Cut off the root CA from the cluster-distributed client CA #949
Conversation
It appears that MicroShift is crashing during the boot phase, but the stack trace is overflowing the output here, which makes it hard to understand what's causing it. |
I've create the dev environment to debug. Looks like the logic writes two certificates into the CSR signer cert file, which Kube does not seem to like. I'll fix this. |
The latest patch should make the KCM start again |
/test periodics-images |
/test e2e-openshift-conformance-sig-api-machinery |
|
/test all |
The current cert creation tooling might be confused if we did not provide a service name. I'm supplying "remove-this" as this code should be refactored soon.A The current cert creation tooling might be confused if we did not provide a service name. I'm supplying "remove-this" as this code should be refactored soon.
"tls.crt", "tls.key", | ||
[]string{"system:admin", "system:masters"}); err != nil { | ||
[]string{"remove-this"}); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not understanding this. Are you including "remove-this" in order to remember that we have to refactor this piece of code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exactly, in fact, this piece of code goes away with #951
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I'd have prefered a // TODO: comment, but since it's going away in the next PR, I'm ok with it.
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: oglok, stlaz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test e2e-rpm-install |
@stlaz: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This PR makes the following changes: