Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1866399: Shorten retry interval in must-gather #527

Merged

Conversation

sallyom
Copy link
Contributor

@sallyom sallyom commented Aug 20, 2020

This cuts down must-gather time by ~2 min.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sallyom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1866399, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1866399: Shorten retry interval in must-gather

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2020
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit
/approve

@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ func newPrefixWriter(out io.Writer, prefix string) io.Writer {

func (o *MustGatherOptions) waitForPodRunning(pod *corev1.Pod) error {
phase := pod.Status.Phase
err := wait.PollImmediate(time.Minute, time.Duration(o.Timeout)*time.Second, func() (bool, error) {
err := wait.PollImmediate(3*time.Second, time.Duration(o.Timeout)*time.Second, func() (bool, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Running means that the init container that does the heavy listing finished its job, which on some clusters might take a while. So instead of poking this every 3s, which is too much I'd bump this to 10s, maybe, wdyt @sallyom ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

from testing, I believe 3 sec is all we need, the cmd does this:

  1. wait for init container running (if you look at the must-gather pod at this point it will show Init:0/1 while init container runs. (this is the 1st 3 second retry - I haven't seen it take longer than 2 retries)
  2. gather container logs - this happens in the init container
  3. wait for must-gather pod Running - this doesn't start until the init container is done, so 3 seconds is also good for this one - I haven't seen this take longer than 2 retries, either. Once the init container completes (step 2 above) container turns to Running.

With this change, we actually cut a couple of unnecessary minutes off of must-gather!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oki doke

@soltysh soltysh self-assigned this Aug 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 21, 2020
@sallyom
Copy link
Contributor Author

sallyom commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ func newPrefixWriter(out io.Writer, prefix string) io.Writer {

func (o *MustGatherOptions) waitForPodRunning(pod *corev1.Pod) error {
phase := pod.Status.Phase
err := wait.PollImmediate(time.Minute, time.Duration(o.Timeout)*time.Second, func() (bool, error) {
err := wait.PollImmediate(3*time.Second, time.Duration(o.Timeout)*time.Second, func() (bool, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oki doke

@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Aug 25, 2020

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sallyom, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 931d20f into openshift:master Aug 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sallyom: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1866399 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1866399: Shorten retry interval in must-gather

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants