New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cherry-pick to 3.6 gluster block #6967
cherry-pick to 3.6 gluster block #6967
Conversation
/hold |
4cc4633
to
9bdc1e2
Compare
@jarrpa this one still kicking... testing now... |
looks like same dynamic inventory case here:
to
Because of this endpoints templates gets evaluates wrong... testing the fix before committing... But it might be fixed again for all branches... |
We don't want to hold up these PRs for this dynamic inventory stuff, and in particular I don't want it on QE's radar to test for it. If you can, push through without it and we'll backport the group fixes separately. |
9bdc1e2
to
4351572
Compare
this one does not hold... But it fails due firewall now... I move forward overwriting those using debug mode, but now storage failing to provision. I suspect slightly different firewall management comparing to 3.7+ branch... Will test it again first thing in the morning... |
@mjudeikis Always run tox on your end. |
be0c8d8
to
a866379
Compare
@jarrpa for this we were firewall... so Copied it from 3.7+ but because plays are little bit different, added it just before Pods are created. Other option would be included before config... any ideas? |
/hold cancel |
@mjudeikis Put the firewall include before the node labeling task. |
a866379
to
434605b
Compare
@jarrpa did it but would like to know your thinking behind this. I was thinking to do this just before deployment of the pods as its one pre-req needed for nodes. So if anything fails before deployment of pods, we would not leave residual firewalls rules open. |
In 3.7+ all the firewall modifications get done before the main role tasks even run, so there's precedent for this. I just like having it at early as reasonably possible, and I figured just after any wipe operations was good enough. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/test crio |
/retest |
/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge] |
@mjudeikis: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Automatic merge from submit-queue. |
No description provided.