Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.6] etcd upgrade: move validate_etcd_conf.yml to etcd_upgrade role #7988

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 26, 2018

Conversation

vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

@vrutkovs vrutkovs commented Apr 17, 2018

Follow-up for #7781, moves config yaml to the etcd_upgrade role.
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567857

No cherrypick required for 3.7+ branches, as these use etcd role for upgrade

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 17, 2018
@vrutkovs vrutkovs changed the title etcd upgrade: move validate_etcd_conf.yml to etcd_upgrade role [3.6] etcd upgrade: move validate_etcd_conf.yml to etcd_upgrade role Apr 17, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelgugino michaelgugino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not following what's going on here. It's just a file being deleted, nothing is moved.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 17, 2018

@michaelgugino In release-3.7 there is no etcd_upgrade role where as in release-3.6 there is and that's where the majority of the changes in #7781 were made but the file referenced here is in the wrong role. It wasn't backported proplery.

@vrutkovs I think maybe you forgot to add roles/etcd_upgrade/tasks/validate_etcd_conf.yml to your commit? this only has deletion of the bad file rather than moving to the proper path.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

Ugh, indeed, my fault

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 17, 2018
@michaelgugino
Copy link
Contributor

@vrutkovs Is there something calling this task_file that is currently failing? How is this supposed to be executed?

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 17, 2018

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 17, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 17, 2018
Copy link
Member

@mtnbikenc mtnbikenc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@mtnbikenc
Copy link
Member

/retest

2 similar comments
@mtnbikenc
Copy link
Member

/retest

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@vrutkovs: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/system-containers 1ad23c6 link /test system-containers
ci/openshift-jenkins/install 1ad23c6 link /test install
ci/openshift-jenkins/logging 1ad23c6 link /test logging

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sdodson sdodson merged commit 54e7984 into openshift:release-3.6 Apr 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants