Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup systemcontainer bits #8329

Conversation

michaelgugino
Copy link
Contributor

This commit removes many systemcontainer tuneables,
especially around container_runtime.

etcd system container tunables are left in place
in some files to aid in determining current installation
type for migration during upgrades.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565078

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: michaelgugino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels May 10, 2018
@michaelgugino michaelgugino force-pushed the container-runtime-syscon-remove branch from 4be6901 to ab35bc3 Compare May 10, 2018 17:04
Copy link
Member

@sdodson sdodson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
We could probably get rid of openshift_docker_service_name too, right?

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 10, 2018
This commit removes many systemcontainer tuneables,
especially around container_runtime.

etcd system container tunables are left in place
in some files to aid in determining current installation
type for migration during upgrades.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565078
@michaelgugino michaelgugino force-pushed the container-runtime-syscon-remove branch from ab35bc3 to 0bb013f Compare May 10, 2018 19:12
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 10, 2018
@michaelgugino
Copy link
Contributor Author

We could probably get rid of openshift_docker_service_name too, right?

Probably. This patch is large enough, I also feel with crio and whatnot we might need this variable again in the future.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 11, 2018
@vrutkovs vrutkovs merged commit 1df2760 into openshift:master May 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants