Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OTA-472: Reorganizing updating clusters section #37977

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sagidlow
Copy link
Contributor

@sagidlow sagidlow commented Oct 26, 2021

Applies to 4.6+
JIRA Link: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-472
QE ack received on original PR (#36015). SME ack needed.
Preview Link:
The remaining sections have been updated to remove the redundancy.

@sagidlow sagidlow added this to the Next Release milestone Oct 26, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 26, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 26, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 80b5bc3

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/61781b5b173a4f0007533bec

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-37977--osdocs.netlify.app

@sagidlow sagidlow force-pushed the OTA-472 branch 15 times, most recently from 3526565 to 967f7e2 Compare October 26, 2021 15:06
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 26, 2021
@sagidlow sagidlow deleted the OTA-472 branch October 26, 2021 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 branch/enterprise-4.8 branch/enterprise-4.9 branch/enterprise-4.10 peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant