Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSDOCS-2875: global Azure availability sets in 4.10 #41316

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 7, 2022

Conversation

jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat commented Feb 2, 2022

For OSDOCS-2875, which documents OCPCLOUD-1223

Notes:
WIP, so far have attempted to refer to avail sets as an alternative to avail zones where appropriate. Added label to sample YAML.

Previews:

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added this to the Future Release milestone Feb 2, 2022
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat changed the title OSDOCS-2875: global Azure availability sets in 4.10 [WIP] OSDOCS-2875: global Azure availability sets in 4.10 Feb 2, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Feb 2, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 2, 2022

✔️ Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: b85ba58

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/61fbe5d6ec0aab0007cfd5f8

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-41316--osdocs.netlify.app

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2022
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat changed the title [WIP] OSDOCS-2875: global Azure availability sets in 4.10 OSDOCS-2875: global Azure availability sets in 4.10 Feb 3, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 3, 2022
@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sunzhaohua2 I see you did the test plan for OCPCLOUD-868, so could you please take a look at this for QA verification?

Copy link
Contributor

@skrthomas skrthomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR label Feb 3, 2022
@sunzhaohua2
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2022
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 3f58b44 into openshift:main Feb 7, 2022
@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #41531

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bobfuru bobfuru modified the milestones: Future Release, OCP 4.10 GA Mar 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.10 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants