Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OADP-717: OADP 1.0.x & OCP 4.11 compatibility issue #51355

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor

@RichardHoch RichardHoch commented Oct 6, 2022

OADP 1.1.1 and OADP 1.0.x; OCP 4.11+

Dev and QE review complete. OCP peer review complete and Avital's suggestion implemented.

Resolves https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-717 by adding a note to the sections shown in the previews.

Previews:

  1. See note in https://51355--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/backup_and_restore/index.html#oadp-requirements

  2. See 2nd note in https://51355--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/backup_and_restore/application_backup_and_restore/installing/about-installing-oadp.html

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 6, 2022
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 6, 2022

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://51355--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/3681

@mperetzred
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 6, 2022
:_content-type: SNIPPET
[NOTE]
====
OADP 1.0._x_ does not support CSI backup on OCP 4.11+. because Velero 1.7.x, which ships with OADP 1.0._x_, expects the API group `snapshot.storage.k8s.io/v1beta1`,` which is not present on OCP 4.11+.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's an extraneous back-tick after the comma that should be removed.

Suggested change
OADP 1.0._x_ does not support CSI backup on OCP 4.11+. because Velero 1.7.x, which ships with OADP 1.0._x_, expects the API group `snapshot.storage.k8s.io/v1beta1`,` which is not present on OCP 4.11+.
OADP 1.0._x_ does not support CSI backup on OCP 4.11+. OADP 1.0._x_ ships Velero 1.7.x and expects the API group `snapshot.storage.k8s.io/v1beta1`, which is not present on OCP 4.11+.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed; ""ships" changed to "includes" due to style guide.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 6, 2022
Copy link

@rayfordj rayfordj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks, @RichardHoch! 👍

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 6, 2022
@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

oadp

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

/oadp

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

/OADP

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

OADP

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label OADP
/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2022

@RichardHoch: Can not set label oadp: Must be member in one of these teams: [team-red-hat]

In response to this:

/label OADP
/label peer-review-needed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2022

@RichardHoch: Can not set label peer-review-needed: Must be member in one of these teams: [team-red-hat]

In response to this:

/label OADP
/label peer-review-needed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh added peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR OADP Label for all OADP PRs labels Oct 6, 2022
@nalhadef
Copy link
Contributor

nalhadef commented Oct 6, 2022

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 6, 2022
@nalhadef
Copy link
Contributor

nalhadef commented Oct 6, 2022

Looks good to me, Richard. No changes added.

@nalhadef
Copy link
Contributor

nalhadef commented Oct 6, 2022

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 6, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 17, 2022
@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

OADP 1.1.1 GA is 28 November.

@jboxman-rh jboxman-rh added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 17, 2022
@jboxman-rh
Copy link

@RichardHoch, should this not be merged until that time?

Thanks!

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jboxman-rh -- That is my understanding; I will double-check but please don't merge yet. Thanks for asking!

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jboxman-rh please merge this

@RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

/OADP
/merge-review-needed
was approved for merging; today is the day

@jboxman-rh
Copy link

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman-rh: new pull request created: #53234

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jboxman-rh
Copy link

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman-rh: new pull request created: #53239

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR OADP Label for all OADP PRs peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants